Writing on verification and implementation risk

Writing on verification, vendor and architecture risk, and what has to be tested and documented before an AI system is relied on. Much of the current archive was written for a litigation audience and uses legal-sector examples.

Written for the people who approve, build and have to live with AI systems.

Analysis grounded in enterprise engineering and regulated-system experience.

Published by Rule26 AI · Research · Guidance · Analysis

Blog posts are for information and education, not legal or insurance advice.

AI Governance Citation Verification Litigation Technology Professional Responsibility AI Hallucinations Court Decisions Legal AI News

Latest Research

Latest Articles

AI Litigation

A 5-Minute Sanity Check for AI-Assisted Briefs

· Salma Saad

AI is already part of many lawyers' drafting workflows. It also confidently invents cases that look real. Here's a simple extra step to verify citations and quotes against the record, free, no AI required.

Read article →

Get an independent read on your AI decision

The same questions run through every engagement: what the architecture assumes, what a vendor is really committing to, what can be independently verified, and what evidence is left behind. Book an initial technical review to work through yours.

Discuss Your Project